Steve H. Powell & Company

  • Contact
  • About us
  • Management
  • Services
    • Loan Review
    • Compliance
    • Due Diligence
    • ALLL Methodology
    • Strategic Planning
  • Newsletter
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • About us
  • Management
  • Services
    • Loan Review
    • Compliance
    • Due Diligence
    • ALLL Methodology
    • Strategic Planning
  • Newsletter
  • Blog

​

Interagency Questions & Answers Regarding Flood Insurance Updated & Interagency Webinar

7/14/2022

0 Comments

 
By: Jeremy Clifton, CRCM, CAMS

On May 31, 2022, all five federal agencies issued a revised Q&A regarding flood insurance coverage. The Q&A is largely a context reorganization of the July 2020 Proposed Q&A and the March 2021 Proposed Q&A to make it easier for the compliance community to research topics regarding flood insurance requirements. The new Q&A supersedes the 2009 and 2011 Q&A responses which have been revised based on updated responses and recommendations from the compliance and banking community. For more information, please refer to the Federal Register entry at: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2022/05/31/2022-10414/loans-in-areas-having-special-flood-hazards-interagency-questions-and-answers-regarding-flood
 
The FDIC will be hosting an interagency webinar to discuss the 2022 Interagency Questions & Answers Regarding Flood Insurance on July 27, 2022. Registration is required and questions can be submitted for consideration before the presentation. For more information and registration see the FDIC’s bulletin: https://content.govdelivery.com/accounts/USFDIC/bulletins/31e467f

0 Comments

Interpretive Rule on Permissible Purposes for Obtaining a Credit Report

7/14/2022

0 Comments

 
By: Steve Shepherd, CRCM

On July 7, 2022, the CFPB (Consumer Financial Protection Bureau) issued an advisory opinion on permissible purposes for obtaining and providing credit reports under section 604 of the FCRA (Fair Credit Reporting Act). The advisory opinion primarily focused on the information submitted to a credit reporting bureau by institutions requesting credit bureau information. The CFPB opinion made it clear that users and agencies have a responsibility to protect the privacy of consumer data.

Under the FCRA, users of consumer reports may request a consumer report only under the enumerated “permissible purposes” outlined within section 604 of the FCRA. That purpose is certified by section 607 of the FCRA through a general or specific purpose. Users of consumer reports submit certain information to the credit reporting bureau to ensure that the request pertains to the consumer of which the information is requested. The institution should ensure that the information identifiers being used contain sufficient information to conduct a search that would avoid obtaining a credit report on a different party or multiple parties. For example, if the institution obtains credit reports by inputting only the name of the party, the institution should develop stronger safeguards to ensure that the credit report belongs to the intended party. Some credit reporting agencies only use the name search options based on information placed in the request portal. The Bureau noted that such credit reports often contain a disclaimer indicating that the consumer report was obtained based on name only matching. The CFPB clarified that such disclaimers do not cure a permissible purpose issue.

Lastly, section 619 of the FCRA imposes criminal penalties on any person who knowingly and willfully obtains information from a consumer reporting agency under false pretenses. 

For more information, please visit the following link: https://www.consumerfinance.gov/rules-policy/final-rules/fair-credit-reporting-permissible-purposes-for-furnishing-using-and-obtaining-consumer-reports/

0 Comments

Joint Statement on the Risk-Based Approach to Assessing Customer Due Diligence

7/11/2022

1 Comment

 
By: Hunter Brown, Financial Institution Specialist
 
On July 6, 2022, the FED, FDIC, FinCEN, NCUA, and OCC (collectively, the Agencies) released a joint statement clarifying their stance on the risk-based approach currently employed by financial institutions to satisfy customer due diligence requirements. The Agencies state that not all customers of a particular type present a uniform risk level. Instead, additional risk factors should be evaluated to generate a holistic risk-profile. The Agencies once again noted that financial institutions should consider risk at a customer level instead of declining to provide banking services to entire categories of customers (e.g. PATM, NRA, NGO, and MSB).
 
To read the full statement, please follow this link:
 
https://www.fincen.gov/sites/default/files/2022-07/Joint%20Statement%20on%20the%20Risk%20Based%20Approach%20to%20Assessing%20Customer%20Relationships%20and%20Conducting%20CDD%20FINAL.pdf
1 Comment

    Archives

    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    May 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    September 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    July 2021
    May 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    October 2020
    August 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    March 2019
    January 2019
    September 2018
    August 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    October 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    June 2016

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly